Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is a fluoroscopic examination of the cervical canal, uterine cavity, fallopian tubes, and peritoneal spill after transcervical administration of iodinated contrast. It is an established test in infertility evaluation, particularly for tubal patency and tubal architecture. It also depicts the cavity outline, but ultrasound, sonohysterography, hysteroscopy, or MRI may characterize uterine and adnexal disease better.
As a radiologic technologist, you may be called upon to assist with HSG procedures in the fluoroscopy suite or interventional radiology setting. Understanding the indications, technique, contrast choices, normal radiographic anatomy, and pathologic findings supports diagnostic-quality studies and appropriate patient care. This guide is an educational overview, not a substitute for supervised training, product labeling, or local protocol.
ARRT's published Radiography Content Specifications include fluoroscopic procedures, contrast media, anatomy, and pathology but do not promise a question count for HSG. Useful review points include menstrual-cycle timing, contrast choices, the normal filling sequence (uterine cavity → fallopian tubes → peritoneal spill), and recognition of hydrosalpinx and intrauterine adhesions.
HSG is primarily performed as part of the infertility workup, but it has several other important indications:
Knowing the contraindications is just as important as knowing the indications. Performing an HSG in an inappropriate clinical setting can lead to serious complications.
HSG is usually scheduled in the early follicular phase, after menstrual flow has ceased and before ovulation—often cycle days 7–11, counting the first day of menses as day 1. Calendar days alone do not exclude pregnancy because cycle length and ovulation vary. Follow the facility's pregnancy-screening policy, and do not proceed if pregnancy is possible.
Proper patient preparation affects study quality, safety, and comfort. The technologist's role may include screening, setup, imaging, documentation, and assistance, but who may perform cervical instrumentation or administer contrast depends on licensure, supervision, credentialing, and local policy.
The choice between oil-based and water-based contrast media has clinical implications that affect both image quality and patient outcomes. Understanding the differences is important for the ARRT exam and for assisting the radiologist.
| Characteristic | Water-Soluble (Iodinated) | Oil-Based (Lipiodol) |
|---|---|---|
| Examples | Nonionic low-osmolar agents such as iohexol or iopamidol, when selected under local protocol; verify product route/labeling | Lipiodol (ethiodized oil), FDA-labeled for adult HSG |
| Viscosity / handling | Lower viscosity; nonionic low-osmolar agents are favored among water-soluble options | More viscous; inject slowly in small increments under fluoroscopy |
| Clearance | Rapid absorption from the peritoneum | May remain in the body for months; can interfere with thyroid testing/treatment |
| Typical ACR volume range | 10–30 mL, adjusted to anatomy and the diagnostic endpoint | 2–15 mL; FDA labeling directs 2-mL increments and usually no more than 15 mL |
| Fertility evidence | HSG itself is primarily diagnostic; any flushing benefit is not guaranteed | Higher pregnancy and live-birth rates than water-based contrast were found in selected infertile populations; this evidence does not promise an individual pregnancy or apply to every patient |
| Intravasation consequence | Stop injection when intravasation is seen; systemic allergic-like reaction remains possible | Stop immediately: intravasation can cause serious pulmonary or cerebral oil embolism |
| Other specific concerns | Prior allergic-like reaction to iodinated contrast requires risk assessment | Foreign-body granuloma and delayed hypo- or hyperthyroidism; thyroid screening/follow-up and FDA contraindications apply |
| Practice pattern | More commonly used in the United States | Use only after weighing possible fertility benefit against agent-specific risks and restrictions |
Before the patient enters the room, verify that the following equipment is ready:
An acorn-tipped cannula seals at the external cervical os; a purpose-designed balloon catheter can reduce contrast leakage. Catheter choice and balloon location/volume must follow the device instructions and operator judgment—do not apply a universal French size or inflation volume. Prime the cannula/tubing vertically and remove all air before connection. If a balloon is used, obtain final images with it deflated so it does not conceal the lower uterine cavity or cervical canal.
The following is a representative sequence, not a substitute for the supervising physician's protocol, state scope-of-practice rules, device instructions, or contrast labeling. The examination is performed under a qualified physician's supervision and interpreted by a licensed physician.
A scout (pre-contrast) pelvic image may be obtained when indicated by local protocol to assess positioning or identify radiopaque material that could confound interpretation. It is not an ACR-mandated exposure for every patient. Center and collimate to the anatomy needed for the clinical question rather than automatically exposing the entire bony pelvis.
Using aseptic technique, the operator inserts a speculum, prepares the cervix according to local policy, and accesses the cervical canal or endometrial cavity with an appropriate cannula or catheter. A tenaculum is used only when needed; less traumatic approaches can reduce cervical pain. Prime the system vertically to remove air. For a balloon catheter, use only the manufacturer-specified inflation medium, location, and minimum effective volume—overinflation can cause pain, obscure pathology, or injure the uterus.
Administer the smallest appropriate amount of the ordered contrast slowly under intermittent, preferably pulsed fluoroscopic observation. Select the lowest pulse rate that preserves the information needed; a fixed 2–4 pulses/second is not appropriate for every system or clinical situation. Do not inject against marked resistance or severe pain. Avoid overdistending a hydrosalpinx. Monitor continuously for intravasation and stop if it occurs—immediately when oil-based contrast is used.
Multiple spot images are obtained during the examination:
Interpreting HSG images requires familiarity with normal anatomy and the ability to recognize common pathologic patterns. The following comparison table summarizes key findings every rad tech should know for the ARRT exam.
| Structure | Normal Finding | Pathologic Finding | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uterine cavity | Smooth, triangular (pear-shaped) contour; homogeneous contrast filling | Irregular contour, filling defects, or distorted shape | May indicate fibroids (submucosal), polyps, adhesions (Asherman syndrome), or congenital anomalies |
| Uterine septae | Single cavity; no internal division | Two endometrial channels/horns may reflect a septate or bicornuate configuration | HSG cannot show the external fundal contour reliably and therefore cannot reliably distinguish septate from bicornuate uterus; use 3D ultrasound or MRI. Treatment decisions require specialist evaluation |
| Cervical canal | Smooth, fusiform canal connecting vagina to uterine cavity | Irregular narrowing, filling defects, or fistula tracts | Cervical stenosis may cause difficult cannulation. Fistulae suggest prior surgery or trauma |
| Cornua (tubal ostia) | Smooth, funnel-shaped openings at the superolateral corners of the cavity | Blunted, occluded, or irregular cornua | Proximal tubal occlusion at the cornual level — may be due to spasm, debris, or true fibrosis |
| Fallopian tube — Isthmus | Thin, uniform, thread-like proximal segment; smooth walls | Irregular dilation, strictures, salpingitis isthmica nodosa (SIN: multiple small diverticula) | SIN is associated with ectopic pregnancy risk and tubal infertility |
| Fallopian tube — Ampulla | Wider, gently curving distal segment; smooth mucosal folds | Dilated, sacculated distal tube with no peritoneal spill = hydrosalpinx | Hydrosalpinx is a consequence and imaging marker of distal tubal occlusion; common associations include prior PID and endometriosis |
| Fimbriae / Peritoneal spill | Free radiopaque contrast spill from each tube, dispersing in the peritoneal cavity | No spill from one or both tubes; localized spill suggesting peritubal adhesions | Absent spill suggests occlusion but must be interpreted with filling pattern and artifacts. Loculated spill may suggest peritubal adhesions |
| Intravasation | Not present | Contrast visible within uterine or ovarian veins — appears as fine, wispy, branching channels extending away from the uterus | Associated with pressure, tubal occlusion, bleeding or recent instrumentation. Stop injection and notify the physician; with oil-based contrast, halt immediately because embolism can be serious |
| Lymphatic filling | Not present | Contrast in fine, tortuous lymphatic channels near the uterine cornua | Distinguish lymphatic/vascular opacification from tubal filling; stop injection and obtain physician assessment |
For the ARRT exam, you should be able to differentiate the following congenital uterine anomalies based on their HSG appearance:
Memorize these eponymous signs for the registry:
• "Tubal diverticulosis" / Salpingitis Isthmica Nodosa (SIN) — Multiple small, contrast-filled outpouchings along the proximal isthmic portion of the tube, giving a "honeycomb" or "necklace" appearance.
• "Hydrosalpinx" — A dilated, fluid-filled distal tube; appears as a sac-like or "cigar-shaped" structure with no peritoneal spill.
• "Cornual block" — Contrast fills the uterine cavity but does not enter one or both tubes. Especially when bilateral, proximal nonfilling needs confirmation because tubal/myometrial contraction, mucus/debris, or catheter position can mimic obstruction.
• "Asherman syndrome" — Irregular, angulated filling defects within the uterine cavity representing intrauterine synechiae (adhesions), most commonly post-D&C.
HSG uses ionizing radiation in the pelvis, so pregnancy exclusion, examination justification, and ALARA optimization are essential. Do not label an organ absorbed dose in mGy as “effective dose” (reported in mSv). Published doses vary substantially with equipment, patient size, fluoroscopy time, number of acquisitions, and protocol; a single universal HSG dose is misleading. The exposure does not remain in the body and has not been shown to harm a pregnancy conceived later in the same cycle, but HSG must not be performed when pregnancy is suspected.
Record fluoroscopy time and available equipment-reported dose indices (for example, reference air kerma and kerma-area product) as required by applicable law, accreditation, and facility policy. These indices are not the patient's exact ovarian or effective dose, and fluoroscopy time alone is a poor dose surrogate. Review thresholds are procedure- and facility-specific; there is no universal ARRT “5-minute” trigger.
After removing the catheter/cannula and speculum, assess symptoms and assist the patient upright when clinically ready; a mandatory 5–10-minute supine period is not evidence-based for every patient. Provide agent- and facility-specific written instructions:
| Complication | Incidence | Presentation | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vasovagal reaction | Uncommon; rates vary | Light-headedness, nausea, pallor, bradycardia, hypotension, or syncope | Stop the procedure, place safely supine, assess airway/breathing/circulation and vital signs, and follow the facility emergency protocol; medications only by qualified order |
| Pelvic infection (PID) | Uncommon overall; risk is higher with prior PID or dilated tubes | Fever, increasing pelvic pain, or abnormal/foul discharge after the procedure | Prompt clinician assessment and guideline-based antibiotics; severe illness may require emergency care/hospitalization |
| Contrast intravasation | Reported rates vary by agent and population | Branching venous/lymphatic opacification during injection | Stop injection and notify the physician. Oil intravasation requires urgent assessment/monitoring because pulmonary or cerebral embolism can occur immediately or hours to days later |
| Uterine/cervical injury or perforation | Rare; a reliable universal HSG rate is not established | Unexpected instrument depth, severe pain, bleeding, or abnormal extraluminal contrast pattern | Stop instrumentation/injection; physician assessment, vital-sign monitoring, and escalation based on bleeding, peritoneal signs, or instability |
| Allergic-like contrast reaction | Rare with nonvascular HSG, but systemic absorption/intravasation makes it possible | Urticaria, angioedema, bronchospasm, hypotension, or anaphylaxis | Stop administration and use the facility's contrast-reaction/emergency protocol; epinephrine is first-line for anaphylaxis |
| Pulmonary/cerebral oil embolism (oil-based contrast only) | Rare but potentially fatal | Dyspnea, hypoxemia, cough, chest pain, altered mental status, seizure, or focal neurologic deficit, immediately or after a delay | Activate emergency response and obtain urgent specialist/emergency evaluation. Management is supportive and syndrome-specific; routine anticoagulation is not established for oil embolism |
Intravasation appears as fine branching vascular or lymphatic opacities extending from the uterus rather than following the expected tubal course. Stop injection and alert the physician. Predisposing circumstances include tubal obstruction/high intrauterine pressure, active bleeding, or recent uterine instrumentation. Water-soluble intravasation is often clinically silent, but assess the patient and follow protocol. With oil-based contrast, stop immediately and evaluate urgently because pulmonary or cerebral embolism may be delayed; do not dismiss an asymptomatic patient without following the supervising physician's monitoring plan.
Patients undergoing infertility workup may also receive other imaging studies. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each modality helps you answer exam questions and counsel patients.
| Modality | Advantages | Limitations | Primary Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSG (fluoroscopy) | Established test with bilateral tubal detail and real-time spill assessment; can suggest proximal/distal obstruction and peritubal adhesions | Ionizing radiation; iodinated contrast and transcervical instrumentation; limited cavity sensitivity and no direct ovarian, myometrial, or peritoneal visualization; proximal nonfilling may be artifact | Tubal patency and architecture; cavity outline |
| Sonohysterography (saline infusion sonography — SIS/SHG) | No ionizing radiation; better cavity detail than HSG; evaluates myometrium and adnexa | Simple saline cul-de-sac fluid may show that at least one tube is patent but not which one; dedicated contrast technique is needed for side-specific tubal assessment; operator-dependent | Polyps, submucosal fibroids, adhesions, cavity shape |
| Pelvic MRI | Excellent soft-tissue and external fundal contour assessment; no ionizing radiation | Cost, examination time, and availability; routine MRI does not test tubal patency | Problem-solving for Müllerian anomalies, adenomyosis, and selected endometriosis evaluation |
| Hystero-salpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) | No radiation; real-time assessment; can evaluate both cavity and tubal patency | Operator-dependent; requires contrast agent (echogenic); less tubal detail than HSG | Alternative to HSG in some centers for tubal patency screening |
| Diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation | Directly evaluates pelvic/peritoneal disease and can assess tubal spill or treat selected pathology | Invasive, usually requires anesthesia, and does not evaluate the cavity without hysteroscopy; ASRM does not recommend it routinely solely to assess patency | When surgery is otherwise indicated or significant pelvic pathology is suspected |
Try these ARRT-style multiple choice questions based on this article. Click an option to check your answer — correct answers turn green, wrong ones turn red.