Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is a fluoroscopic imaging procedure that evaluates the uterine cavity and fallopian tube patency using iodine-based contrast media. It remains one of the most important diagnostic tools in the workup of female infertility, providing real-time anatomical and functional information that no other imaging modality can match.
As a radiologic technologist, you may be called upon to assist with HSG procedures in the fluoroscopy suite or interventional radiology setting. Understanding the indications, step-by-step technique, contrast choices, normal radiographic anatomy, and pathologic findings is essential for producing diagnostic-quality studies and providing optimal patient care. This guide covers everything you need to know for clinical practice and the ARRT registry.
HSG questions appear on the ARRT exam under the Fluoroscopy/Interventional Procedures category. You should know the timing within the menstrual cycle, contrast media types, normal filling sequence (uterine cavity → fallopian tubes → peritoneal spill), and key pathologic findings such as hydrosalpinx and intrauterine adhesions (Asherman syndrome).
HSG is primarily performed as part of the infertility workup, but it has several other important indications:
Knowing the contraindications is just as important as knowing the indications. Performing an HSG in an inappropriate clinical setting can lead to serious complications.
HSG is typically scheduled during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle — days 7 through 10 counting day 1 as the first day of menses. This timing ensures that (1) menstrual bleeding has stopped, (2) the endometrium is thin enough for optimal cavity visualization, and (3) the patient is not yet ovulating, minimizing the risk of imaging during an early undetected pregnancy.
Proper patient preparation directly impacts study quality and patient comfort. As the rad tech assisting with or performing the procedure, you play a key role in ensuring readiness.
The choice between oil-based and water-based contrast media has clinical implications that affect both image quality and patient outcomes. Understanding the differences is important for the ARRT exam and for assisting the radiologist.
| Characteristic | Water-Soluble (Iodinated) | Oil-Based (Lipiodol) |
|---|---|---|
| Common brands | Omnipaque (iohexol), Isovue (iopamidol), Optiray (ioversol) | Lipiodol (ethiodized poppyseed oil) |
| Viscosity | Low — easier to inject, better mucosal coating | High — slower injection, thicker consistency |
| Image quality | Good delineation of mucosal detail; mixes with peritoneal fluid | Excellent contrast density; may obscure small filling defects |
| Absorption | Rapid — absorbed from peritoneal cavity within minutes | Slow — may persist for weeks; risk of granuloma formation |
| Post-procedure pregnancy rates | Moderate improvement | Higher pregnancy rates reported in some studies (possible tubal flushing effect) |
| Risk of intravasation | Lower risk; contrast is rapidly diluted if venous entry occurs | Higher risk of oil embolization — can cause pulmonary embolism in rare cases |
| Risk of granuloma | Minimal | Higher — residual oil in the peritoneum can cause foreign body granulomas |
| Cost | Moderate | Higher |
| ARRT relevance | Most commonly used in US practice | Be familiar with the risks — commonly tested on registry |
Before the patient enters the room, verify that the following equipment is ready:
Be familiar with the different cannula types: the Rubin cannula (acorn-tipped, inserted into the external cervical os) is traditional but prone to leakage. Balloon catheters (similar to a pediatric Foley, size 5–8 French) are now more common — the balloon is inflated inside the uterine cavity or cervical canal to prevent contrast backflow. The ARRT exam may ask which cannula is best for patients with cervical incompetence or a patulous cervical os.
The following sequence describes the standard HSG examination from a technologist's perspective. Each step requires coordination between the technologist and the performing physician.
Before any instrumentation, a scout (pre-contrast) pelvic radiograph is obtained. The scout image serves several purposes: it confirms correct positioning (centered at the level of the symphysis pubis), evaluates for any radiopaque pelvic calcifications or foreign bodies that could mimic pathology, and establishes a baseline for contrast injection. The collimation should include the entire pelvis from the iliac crests to the pubic symphysis.
The physician performs a sterile speculum examination of the cervix. The cervix is cleansed with antiseptic solution, and the anterior lip is grasped with a tenaculum to stabilize the uterus and straighten the uterine-cervical angle. The cannula or balloon catheter is then inserted through the cervical os. For balloon catheters, the balloon is inflated with 1–3 mL of air or saline within the uterine cavity or endocervical canal, then gently retracted to seat it against the internal os.
Contrast is injected slowly and steadily under intermittent fluoroscopic guidance (pulsed fluoroscopy at 2–4 pulses per second to minimize radiation dose). The injection is monitored in real time:
Multiple spot images are obtained during the examination:
Interpreting HSG images requires familiarity with normal anatomy and the ability to recognize common pathologic patterns. The following comparison table summarizes key findings every rad tech should know for the ARRT exam.
| Structure | Normal Finding | Pathologic Finding | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uterine cavity | Smooth, triangular (pear-shaped) contour; homogeneous contrast filling | Irregular contour, filling defects, or distorted shape | May indicate fibroids (submucosal), polyps, adhesions (Asherman syndrome), or congenital anomalies |
| Uterine septae | Single cavity; no internal division | Septate uterus: a thin septum dividing the cavity partially or completely. Bicornuate uterus: two separate cavities with a deep fundal cleft | Septate uterus is surgically correctable (hysteroscopic septoplasty). Bicornuate is associated with higher miscarriage risk |
| Cervical canal | Smooth, fusiform canal connecting vagina to uterine cavity | Irregular narrowing, filling defects, or fistula tracts | Cervical stenosis may cause difficult cannulation. Fistulae suggest prior surgery or trauma |
| Cornua (tubal ostia) | Smooth, funnel-shaped openings at the superolateral corners of the cavity | Blunted, occluded, or irregular cornua | Proximal tubal occlusion at the cornual level — may be due to spasm, debris, or true fibrosis |
| Fallopian tube — Isthmus | Thin, uniform, thread-like proximal segment; smooth walls | Irregular dilation, strictures, salpingitis isthmica nodosa (SIN: multiple small diverticula) | SIN is associated with ectopic pregnancy risk and tubal infertility |
| Fallopian tube — Ampulla | Wider, gently curving distal segment; smooth mucosal folds | Dilated, sacculated distal tube with no peritoneal spill = hydrosalpinx | Hydrosalpinx is a common cause of distal tubal occlusion; associated with prior PID or endometriosis |
| Fimbriae / Peritoneal spill | Free spill of contrast from both tubes; contrast pools in the pouch of Douglas (dark, amorphous cloud around the distal tube and uterus) | No spill from one or both tubes; localized spill suggesting peritubal adhesions | Absent spill = tubal occlusion. Loculated spill = peritubal adhesions tethering the fimbriae |
| Intravasation | Not present | Contrast visible within uterine or ovarian veins — appears as fine, wispy, branching channels extending away from the uterus | Caused by excessive injection pressure, recent uterine surgery, or damaged endometrium. Stop injection immediately if observed |
| Lymphatic filling | Not present | Contrast in fine, tortuous lymphatic channels near the uterine cornua | Similar etiology to intravasation; more common with oil-based contrast. Usually self-limited |
For the ARRT exam, you should be able to differentiate the following congenital uterine anomalies based on their HSG appearance:
Memorize these eponymous signs for the registry:
• "Tubal diverticulosis" / Salpingitis Isthmica Nodosa (SIN) — Multiple small, contrast-filled outpouchings along the proximal isthmic portion of the tube, giving a "honeycomb" or "necklace" appearance.
• "Hydrosalpinx" — A dilated, fluid-filled distal tube; appears as a sac-like or "cigar-shaped" structure with no peritoneal spill.
• "Cornual block" — Contrast fills the uterine cavity but does not enter one or both tubes, suggesting proximal occlusion (but must distinguish from transient spasm).
• "Asherman syndrome" — Irregular, angulated filling defects within the uterine cavity representing intrauterine synechiae (adhesions), most commonly post-D&C.
HSG involves ionizing radiation directed at the pelvis, and dose management is a critical responsibility for the technologist. Although the effective dose is relatively low compared to CT (typically 0.5–2 mGy ovarian dose per examination), the ovaries are radiosensitive organs, and many patients undergoing HSG will be attempting pregnancy in the near future.
The ARRT requires documentation of fluoroscopy time and dose (dose-area product, DAP, or air kerma) for every fluoroscopic procedure. As the technologist, you are responsible for recording these values in the patient's exam record. Total fluoroscopy time exceeding 5 minutes should trigger a review of technique and justification.
After the cannula is removed and speculum withdrawn, the patient should remain supine for 5–10 minutes before slowly sitting up. Post-procedure instructions include:
| Complication | Incidence | Presentation | Management |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vasovagal reaction | Up to 5% | Bradycardia, hypotension, syncope, nausea | Lie patient flat, elevate legs; atropine if severe; monitor vitals |
| Pelvic infection (PID) | 1–3% | Fever, pelvic pain, vaginal discharge 24–72 h post-procedure | IV/oral antibiotics; may require hospitalization for tubo-ovarian abscess |
| Contrast intravasation | 2–8% | Wispy venous or lymphatic channels seen fluoroscopically | Stop injection immediately; most cases are self-limited; observe for oil embolization if oil-based contrast used |
| Uterine perforation | <0.5% | Sharp pain; cannula passes beyond expected depth; contrast extravasates into myometrium or peritoneum | Terminate procedure; vital sign monitoring; surgical consult if hemodynamic instability |
| Allergic contrast reaction | 0.2–0.7% | Urticaria, bronchospasm, anaphylaxis | Per departmental contrast reaction protocol (antihistamines, epinephrine, corticosteroids as indicated) |
| Oil embolization (oil-based contrast only) | Rare (<0.1%) | Respiratory distress, cough, chest pain, hemoptysis during or immediately after procedure | Supportive care, oxygen, anticoagulation in severe cases; pulmonary embolism protocol |
Intravasation appears as a fine, feathery, or wispy network of linear opacities extending lateral to the uterus — these are contrast-filled uterine or ovarian veins. If you see this on the monitor, alert the radiologist immediately. The injection should be stopped. Intravasation is more common with: (1) excessive injection pressure, (2) recent endometrial biopsy or D&C (within 6 weeks), (3) use of oil-based contrast, and (4) a damaged or thin endometrium. In most cases, the contrast is rapidly diluted and symptoms are absent, but the exam should be terminated to avoid further venous entry.
Patients undergoing infertility workup may also receive other imaging studies. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each modality helps you answer exam questions and counsel patients.
| Modality | Advantages | Limitations | Primary Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSG (fluoroscopy) | Gold standard for tubal patency; real-time dynamic imaging; low cost; can be therapeutic (tubal flushing effect) | Ionizing radiation; iodinated contrast risk; invasive cervical instrumentation; no direct visualization of ovarian or myometrial pathology | Tubal patency, uterine cavity assessment |
| Hysterosonography (saline infusion sonography — SIS) | No radiation; good uterine cavity detail; can evaluate myometrium and ovaries concurrently | Does not assess tubal patency reliably; operator-dependent | Uterine cavity evaluation (polyps, fibroids, adhesions) |
| Pelvic MRI | Excellent soft-tissue characterization; no radiation; gold standard for congenital uterine anomaly classification | Expensive; long exam time; does not assess tubal patency; limited availability | Characterizing known uterine anomalies, deep pelvic endometriosis, adenomyosis |
| Hystero-salpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) | No radiation; real-time assessment; can evaluate both cavity and tubal patency | Operator-dependent; requires contrast agent (echogenic); less tubal detail than HSG | Alternative to HSG in some centers for tubal patency screening |
| Diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation | Gold standard for tubal and peritoneal pathology; can treat pathology concurrently | Invasive; requires general anesthesia; higher cost and risk; does not evaluate uterine cavity without hysteroscopy | Definitive diagnosis when HSG is equivocal or positive for tubal disease |
Try these ARRT-style multiple choice questions based on this article. Click an option to check your answer — correct answers turn green, wrong ones turn red.