Home Articles Zygomatic Arch Positioning

Zygomatic Arch X-Ray Positioning: SMV, Tangential, Towne & Titterington Views

The zygomatic arch (cheekbone) is one of the most commonly fractured facial bones — second only to the nasal bones. It's formed by the zygomatic process of the temporal bone and the temporal process of the zygomatic bone, joined by the zygomaticotemporal suture. When a patient comes in after a fistfight, sports injury, or MVA with facial swelling and tenderness over the cheek, you'll be asked to image the zygomatic arches.

As a radiologic technologist, you need to know four dedicated projections for the zygomatic arch series, plus their centering points, critical angles, and contraindications. These are frequently tested on the ARRT exam, and getting them right matters — a missed depressed fracture can lead to malunion, cosmetic deformity, and functional problems with mastication.

This guide covers all four views: SMV (bilateral), tangential jug handle (unilateral), AP axial modified Towne, and PA axial modified Titterington, with Clark's-sourced positioning data, centering point tables, evaluation criteria, and exam tips.

Radiograph demonstrating a fracture of the zygomatic arch marked by an arrow
Zygomatic arch fracture indicated by the arrow. Image: James Heilman, MD, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Anatomy of the Zygomatic Bone

Before we get into positioning, let's review the key anatomy. The zygomatic bone is a paired, quadrilateral-shaped bone that forms the prominence of your cheek (the "malar" prominence). Each bone has four processes that connect it to surrounding structures:

StructureConnectionClinical Notes
Frontal processArticulates with frontal bone (zygomaticofrontal suture)Forms lateral orbital wall; Whitnall's tubercle attachment
Temporal processArticulates with zygomatic process of temporal boneForms the zygomatic arch itself
Maxillary processArticulates with maxilla (zygomaticomaxillary suture)Forms inferolateral orbital rim
Sphenoid articulationGreater wing of sphenoidDeep orbital wall component

The zygomatic arch provides width to the face and plays an important functional role in protecting the orbit and providing attachment for the masseter muscle. Fractures here can affect chewing.

Zygomatic Fracture Patterns

You'll encounter three main fracture patterns:

💡 ARRT Exam Tip

The ARRT frequently tests fracture pattern recognition. Remember: Tripod = three sutures (frontozygomatic + zygomaticomaxillary + arch). Le Fort III = complete midface separation involving pterygoid plates. The Waters view is the single best projection for evaluating Le Fort fractures because it shows the maxillary sinuses, orbital floors, and zygomatic arches in one image.

Routine Projections for the Zygomatic Arch Series

The zygomatic arch series traditionally includes four projections:

  1. SMV (Submentovertex) — Bilateral, both arches in one image
  2. Oblique Inferosuperior Tangential (Jug Handle) — Unilateral, side of injury
  3. AP Axial Modified Towne — Bilateral overview
  4. PA Axial Modified Titterington — Bilateral, alternative to Towne

In clinical practice, the SMV and Tangential (jug handle) views are the most commonly performed. The Towne and Titterington views are often part of a comprehensive facial bone series or used when the SMV is contraindicated.

View 1: Submentovertex (SMV) — Bilateral Zygomatic Arches

The SMV provides a bird's-eye view of the skull base and is the best single projection for evaluating both zygomatic arches simultaneously.

Patient Positioning

⚠️ Clinical Pearl

The SMV requires significant neck hyperextension. NEVER attempt this projection on a patient with a suspected cervical spine injury — you could displace an unstable vertebral fracture. Use the tangential jug handle view as an alternative. Also, do not leave the patient in this position longer than necessary — the increased cranial pressure can leave them dizzy once they sit up.

Technical Factors

ParameterSMV Zygomatic Arches
ProjectionSubmentovertex (inferosuperior)
SID100 cm (40 in)
IR size24 × 30 cm (10 × 12 in), crosswise or lengthwise
CRPerpendicular to IOML
Centering pointMidway between the angles of the mandible (approximately 1 inch/2.5 cm posterior to outer canthus)
GridYes
RespirationSuspended
AECNot recommended

Evaluation Criteria

View 2: Oblique Inferosuperior Tangential (Jug Handle View) — Unilateral

This is the dedicated unilateral view for the injured zygomatic arch. It's also called the "jug handle view" because the arch looks like a bucket handle on the image.

Patient Positioning

Technical Factors

ParameterOblique Inferosuperior Tangential
ProjectionInferosuperior tangential
SID100 cm (40 in)
IR size18 × 24 cm (8 × 10 in) — "cone-down" view
CRPerpendicular to IOML
Centering pointCentered directly to the zygomatic arch of interest
GridYes
RespirationSuspended
AECDo NOT use AEC — use manual technique

💡 Clinical Pearl — AEC Pitfall

The tangential (jug handle) view is a coned-down projection of a thin bony structure surrounded by air and soft tissue. AEC will overexpose the image because the ionization chambers detect insufficient attenuation through the arch. Use a manual technique with slightly less than the normal zygomatic arch exposure factors — typically around 60–65 kVp with a low mAS.

Evaluation Criteria

View 3: AP Axial Modified Towne Method — Bilateral

The modified Towne view is an excellent alternative when the SMV cannot be performed. It provides a bilateral view of the zygomatic arches projected lateral to the mandibular rami.

Patient Positioning

Technical Factors

ParameterAP Axial Modified Towne
ProjectionAP axial
SID100 cm (40 in)
IR size24 × 30 cm (10 × 12 in), lengthwise or crosswise
CR30° caudal to OML
Centering pointGlabella (entering)
GridYes
RespirationSuspended

If the Patient Cannot Flex the Neck

If the patient cannot flex their neck sufficiently to position the OML perpendicular (common in elderly patients or those with cervical arthritis), adjust the positioning:

Evaluation Criteria

View 4: PA Axial Modified Titterington Method — Bilateral

The Titterington method is a PA approach that produces similar results to the Towne view. Some protocols use it as the standard bilateral zygomatic arch projection.

Patient Positioning

Technical Factors

ParameterPA Axial Modified Titterington
ProjectionPA axial
SID100 cm (40 in)
IR size24 × 30 cm (10 × 12 in)
CR23°–38° caudal
Centering pointMidway between the zygomatic arches (exits at the vertex)
GridYes
RespirationSuspended

Angle Selection

The CR angle for the Titterington method has a range of 23° to 38° caudal depending on the anatomy being prioritized:

If the patient cannot assume the PA position (e.g., facial trauma, respiratory distress), substitute with the AP axial modified Towne method instead.

Evaluation Criteria

Positioning Summary Table

ViewPatient PositionCR AngleCentering PointBest Use Case
SMVSupine/seated, neck hyperextended, vertex on IRPerpendicular to IOMLMidway between mandibular anglesStandard bilateral screening
Tangential (Jug Handle)Head rotated 15°, chin tilted 15°Perpendicular to IOMLOver zygomatic arch of interestDepressed fracture, C-spine contraindication
AP Axial TowneSupine/seated, neck flexed30° caudal (OML) / 37° (IOML)GlabellaAlternative to SMV; trauma patients
PA Axial TitteringtonProne/seated, chin + nose on IR23°–38° caudalMidway between zygomatic archesStandard PA approach; also shows IACs

ARRT High-Yield Facts

FactDetails
Most common facial fractureNasal bones (1st), zygomatic bones (2nd), mandible (3rd)
SMV contraindicationSuspected cervical spine injury — neck hyperextension is dangerous
SMV alternativeReverse Waters view or tangential zygomatic arch projection
SMV centering pointMidway between angles of mandible, CR perpendicular to IOML
Tangential head rotation15° toward affected side
Tangential chin tilt15° toward zygomatic arch being imaged
Modified Towne angle30° caudal (OML) or 37° caudal (IOML)
Titterington angle range23°–38° caudal
AEC limitationDo NOT use AEC for tangential jug handle view
Tripod fractureThree fracture lines: frontozygomatic + zygomaticomaxillary + arch
Best view for Le Fort classificationWaters view (parietoacanthial projection)
Common SMV errorRotation causing asymmetric arch visualization

Common Positioning Errors

Rotation on SMV

Rotation is the most common error. When the MSP isn't perpendicular to the IR, one zygomatic arch appears elongated and the other foreshortened. Check your MSP alignment before exposing — palpate the nasion and external occipital protuberance to confirm.

Insufficient Neck Extension on SMV

If the IOML is not parallel to the IR, the arches will appear foreshortened and superimposed by the mandible. The patient needs to extend their neck fully so the vertex touches the IR. Use pillows under the shoulders for supine patients to achieve full extension.

Wrong CR Angle on Towne or Titterington

Use too steep an angle and the arches project too far inferiorly, superimposing on the mandible. Use too shallow an angle and the petrous ridges obscure the arches. Double-check your angle before exposing.

Underexposure on Tangential View

Because the zygomatic arch is a thin bony structure, it's easy to underexpose when using standard technique. AEC makes this worse — it overexposes because it reads the arch as not enough attenuation. Use manual technique with 60–65 kVp and a low mAS.

💡 ARRT Exam Tip

The ARRT registry loves to test the SMV contraindication in trauma scenarios. You'll get a question like: "A patient arrives with facial swelling after an MVA. Cervical spine injury has not been ruled out. Which zygomatic arch projection should be performed?" The answer: Tangential (jug handle) view — it requires minimal neck movement. The follow-up might ask about centering: CR perpendicular to IOML, centered over the zygomatic arch of interest.

Clinical Indications

When to Order a Zygomatic Arch Series

When to Skip Plain Films and Go to CT

In many modern trauma centers, CT has replaced plain film radiography for complex facial fractures. However, plain films remain valuable in smaller hospitals without 24/7 CT access, follow-up evaluation of known fractures, initial screening for isolated zygomatic trauma, and patients with contraindications to CT. If there's clinical suspicion for a tripod fracture or Le Fort pattern, a facial bone CT with 3D reconstruction is the gold standard.

Related Articles

📋

Radiography 101 Clinical Team

Written and reviewed by certified radiologic technologists with clinical and educational expertise. Content is referenced to Clark's Pocket Handbook for Radiographers and current ARRT content specifications.