Arthrography is a fluoroscopic, CT, or MRI examination in which contrast material is placed inside a joint to evaluate structures that routine radiographs cannot show — the labrum, articular cartilage, joint capsule, and ligaments. In direct arthrography, a radiologist injects contrast directly into the joint space under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. In indirect arthrography, iodinated or gadolinium contrast is injected intravenously and allowed to diffuse into the joint before imaging.
Direct arthrography is generally preferred because distending the joint separates its internal structures and improves evaluation of small abnormalities. It is often performed only if a non-arthrographic examination is felt to be inadequate in assessing a joint abnormality. As a radiologic technologist, you may assist with arthrography in the fluoroscopy suite, CT, or MRI setting — and arthrography concepts appear on the ARRT exam.
ARRT's published Radiography Content Specifications include fluoroscopic procedures, contrast media, and musculoskeletal pathology but do not promise a question count for arthrography. High-yield review points: direct versus indirect technique, contrast agent selection by modality (iodinated for conventional/CT, gadolinium for MRI), single versus double-contrast technique, and the major contraindications and complications.
Arthrography is most often used to identify abnormalities within the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle. Common indications include:
Do not inject contrast into a joint when septic arthritis is suspected. If infection is a consideration, the operator aspirates joint fluid for laboratory analysis instead of proceeding with contrast injection. Overlying skin infection at the puncture site, bleeding disorders, and relevant contrast allergy are additional contraindications or precautions that require physician review.
No special preparation is required before direct arthrography. Food and fluid intake do not need to be restricted unless sedation will be given. The technologist's preparation checklist typically includes:
The contrast agent depends on the imaging method that follows the injection. Understanding the differences is important for the ARRT exam and for assisting the radiologist.
| Imaging Method | Contrast Agent | Key Details |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional (fluoroscopy) arthrography | Iodinated water-soluble contrast | Injected under fluoroscopy; the joint is moved to distribute contrast; spot radiographs document findings. Air may be added for double-contrast technique. |
| CT arthrography | Iodinated contrast, concentration 240 mgI/mL or less | Dilute iodinated contrast is used so dense contrast does not obscure adjacent soft tissues on CT. May be supplemented with air for a double-contrast CT arthrogram. |
| MR arthrography | Gadolinium chelate, diluted 1/200–1/250 | Diluted to approximately 0.0020–0.0025 mmol/mL in iodinated contrast or sterile saline. Mixing iodinated contrast with gadolinium is off-label in the US but has been used for many years; ready-to-inject preparations are commercialized in Europe. |
| Therapeutic injection | Corticosteroid + local anesthetic | Steroids such as triamcinolone or methylprednisolone acetate (10–40 mg by joint size) mixed with local anesthetic; non-particulate dexamethasone may be preferred in specific circumstances. |
The following is a representative sequence under fluoroscopic guidance. The examination is performed by or under the direction of a qualified physician; who may perform the injection depends on licensure, credentialing, and local policy.
Position the joint so the needle path aligns with the X-ray beam. A scout image confirms positioning and may identify abnormalities. For MR arthrography, the patient moves to the MRI suite after injection, so the injection itself is typically performed under fluoroscopy or ultrasound first.
Cleanse the skin with antiseptic and apply a sterile drape. Inject local anesthetic through a small needle — the patient may feel a brief sting that usually subsides within 15–20 seconds.
Advance the needle into the joint under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. The ideal needle tip is superimposed over the hub on control images. Upon bone contact, withdraw the needle very slightly and test the injection with anesthetic; a decrease in resistance suggests intra-articular placement. With ultrasound, the needle is introduced tangentially to the transducer so it can be followed to the joint capsule.
Inject a small amount of contrast gently and progressively. Flow of contrast away from the needle tip and opacification of the joint space confirm correct position. Do not inject against marked resistance. If fluid is aspirated, send it for laboratory analysis per protocol — aspiration is performed when infection is suspected.
Inject the ordered volume for the joint (typical diagnostic volumes: shoulder 8–15 mL; elbow about 5 mL; wrist about 2 mL; hip about 10 mL; knee 10–20 mL for diagnostic arthrography though capacity exceeds 40 mL; ankle about 5 mL). Ask the patient to move the joint to distribute the contrast. Obtain spot radiographs or proceed to CT/MRI per protocol. The radiologist may evaluate joint motion under fluoroscopy.
Remove the needle, apply pressure, and observe the patient. Provide aftercare instructions (below). A conventional arthrography examination is usually completed within 30 minutes; examinations involving MRI take longer.
The technique varies by joint; the following summarizes common approaches used in practice. Targeting the articular recess rather than the apparent joint space is a widely taught strategy that can make injection easier and safer.
| Joint | Common Approach | Typical Needle | Capacity / Diagnostic Volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shoulder (glenohumeral) | Anterior approach targeting the rotator interval (arm in external rotation; target the upper medial quadrant of the humeral head); posterior approach to the posterior humeral head is an alternative (prone) | 1.5-inch (3.8 cm) 22-gauge | Normal capacity ~8–15 mL; often <7 mL in adhesive capsulitis |
| Elbow | Anterior approach to the humeroradial compartment (supine, hand behind back); posterior transtriceps approach is an alternative | 1.5-inch 25-gauge | ~5 mL |
| Wrist | Dorsal approach to the radiocarpal joint; midcarpal access for a triple-compartment study | 7/8-inch (2.2 cm) 25-gauge | ~2 mL per compartment |
| Hip | Anterior approach to the anterior recess — lateral (femoral neck) or medial (head-neck junction) portion; slight medial rotation | 3.5-inch (8.9 cm) 22-gauge | ~10 mL |
| Knee | Patellofemoral approach, or anterior approach targeting the lower lateral femoral condyle (slight flexion) | 1.5-inch 22-gauge | Capacity >40 mL; diagnostic arthrography typically 10–20 mL |
| Ankle | Anterior recess just below the joint line (slight plantar flexion, entry lateral to the tibialis anterior tendon) | 1.5-inch 25-gauge | ~5 mL |
For shoulder arthrography, the anterior rotator interval approach with the arm in external rotation avoids the subscapularis tendon and antero-inferior labrum, and external rotation protects the long head of the biceps tendon. The older Schneider technique transgresses more structures. A reduced joint capacity (less than about 7 mL) is classically described with adhesive capsulitis.
Arthrography findings are interpreted by the radiologist, but the technologist benefits from recognizing the appearances:
Fluoroscopy- and CT-guided arthrography uses ionizing radiation; MR arthrography does not. Apply ALARA principles:
| Examination | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional arthrography | Real-time fluoroscopic assessment of joint filling and motion; documents full-thickness rotator cuff tears; relatively quick (~30 min) | Ionizing radiation; limited soft-tissue detail; partial rotator cuff tears, cartilage defects, bone bruising, and extra-articular ligaments may not be detected |
| MR arthrography | Best internal-derangement detail — labrum, cartilage, capsule; no ionizing radiation | Invasive injection; longer examination; gadolinium screening (allergy, renal function, pregnancy) |
| CT arthrography | Excellent for postoperative joints, loose bodies, and patients with MRI contraindications; double-contrast technique can enhance cartilage evaluation | Ionizing radiation; iodinated contrast; less soft-tissue contrast than MRI |
| Routine MRI (no injection) | Noninvasive; excellent soft-tissue evaluation | Less joint distension; small labral or capsular abnormalities may be less conspicuous |
| Ultrasound | No radiation; dynamic assessment; can guide injection without fluoroscopy | Operator-dependent; limited deep-joint evaluation; less detail for labral pathology |
Try these ARRT-style multiple choice questions based on this article. Click an option to check your answer — correct answers turn green, wrong ones turn red.